E
Nimer Report that the Banks f Merchants in Hongkongare in
future
likes
not like to pay their highest Clerks more than 1/1000-yea
We need not take into consideration
the personal allowances drawn by
certain fpontants to go beyond
in the
Cause of futute,
we might not
liberal
(wen if as far as) the very lib faz fixed" with some hesitation
(see par. 3 of desk.)
an 117 3
for these highest clerks
23/90-1)
a year, and future fixes pay.
vij. #2592 a year,
A similar reduction should be mads in the 2nd & 3rd Classes.
(2) I would round off these
awkward figures,
tomake the
annual salaries divisible 410
well as
512.
(3) The lowest salary
in rach
cluss should I think be slightly
higher than
Same an
below.
(4)
mistead of being
| Salay
in in
Do
long
492-
Every year of his service
he rises to a decent rate
of pay, independently of
In chances !
of promotion to the next higher clan. I would therefore propose the
modiped scheme: _
I put ther salaries per following
annum instead
of her.
Jueusem
My scheme A #2160, to #2520
#
by six increasuly
7760
Mr. Inner Scheme
#62304 to $2000
by eaglet increcruti
81472
B #1620 to #1980 $1728 to 182304
by six increments
C$1200 to $1560
by six micrements
D #900 to $1140
by four
Σ $600 to $540
by four increment found 7460
Think $240 7 $300 to $540
is too small
the
prmitial pay
the highest in the class
It is not an excential feature in such a scheme that there
should be increments to
officers
by four increment
71860
$1152 to 1p1728
JA72
by Eight incrementi 7 #72
17864 to 771152 by
3 increments of flye
1576 to 14864 by
3 incremsubs.
17796
$240𔼄,
Sincrements of $112
My proposal would involve a slight reduction, winstead of
a
slight addition to the present Estimates;
but the
despt no. 71 (on 1123/91.2) distinctly contemplated that
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.